Consent for functional endoscopic sinus surgery: Are we complying with the law?

No Thumbnail Available
Authors
Raja, H
Talwar, R
Issue Date
2023
Type
Scientific Paper
Language
Keywords
Research Subject Categories::MEDICINE::Surgery
Research Projects
Organizational Units
Journal Issue
Alternative Title
Abstract
Objective: To assess the current standard of consent for functional endoscopic sinus surgery and determine whether it complies with the law following the Montgomery ruling. Methods: Ten complications following functional endoscopic sinus surgery were identified as common or serious from a literature search. Using questionnaires, ENT surgeons were asked which of these complications they discussed with patients, and patients were asked how seriously they regarded those risks using a five-point Likert scale. Results: Consent practice from 21 ENT surgeons and data from 103 patients were analysed. The 'reasonable patient' would expect to be consented for all risks, except for pain, and scarring or adhesions. Most ENT surgeons would routinely discuss all risks that were considered significant, except for facial paraesthesia (29 per cent) and damage to the nasolacrimal duct (24 per cent). A negative change in sense of smell was not mentioned by 29 per cent of surgeons. Conclusion: This paper demonstrates that the current consent process for functional endoscopic sinus surgery is likely to be substandard medicolegally. Keywords: Communication; Endoscopic Sinus Surgery; Informed Consent; Medicolegal Aspects; Rhinology. PubMed Disclaimer Similar articles Consent for septoplasty: Are we meeting patients' expectations? Raja H, Talwar R. Med Leg J. 2021 Dec;89(4):237-240. doi: 10.1177/00258172211042699. Epub 2021 Oct 4. PMID: 34605292 Medicolegal issues in endoscopic sinus surgery. Patel AM, Still TE, Vaughan W. Otolaryngol Clin North Am. 2010 Aug;43(4):905-14. doi: 10.1016/j.otc.2010.04.014. PMID: 20599093 Review. [Surgical complications of paranasal sinus surgery. Topographical classification and therapeutic management]. Ott I, Baier G. HNO. 2009 Jan;57(1):73-88; quiz 89-90. doi: 10.1007/s00106-008-1858-z. PMID: 19145424 Review. German. Consent for tonsillectomy. Mistry D, Kelly G. Clin Otolaryngol Allied Sci. 2004 Aug;29(4):362-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2273.2004.00818.x. PMID: 15270823 Informed consent in functional endoscopic sinus surgery. Wolf JS, Malekzadeh S, Berry JA, O'Malley BW Jr. Laryngoscope. 2002 May;112(5):774-8. doi: 10.1097/00005537-200205000-00002. PMID: 12150605 See all similar articles Cited by Functional endoscopic sinus surgery: assessing the readability and quality of online information. Raja H, Patel K. Ann R Coll Surg Engl. 2023 Sep;105(7):639-644. doi: 10.1308/rcsann.2022.0123. Epub 2022 Nov 14. PMID: 36374281 MeSH terms Endoscopy / adverse effects Humans Informed Consent Postoperative Complications* / etiology Surgeons* Surveys and Questionnaires Related information MedGen LinkOut - more resources Full Text Sources Cambridge University Press Medical MedlinePlus Health Information Research Materials NCI CPTC Antibody Characterization Program Miscellaneous NCI CPTAC Assay Portal
Description
Citation
Raja H, Talwar R. Consent for functional endoscopic sinus surgery: are we complying with the law? J Laryngol Otol. 2023 Jan;137(1):81-84. doi: 10.1017/S0022215122000974. Epub 2022 Apr 21. PMID: 35445645.
Publisher
License
Journal
Volume
Issue
PubMed ID
DOI
ISSN
35445645
EISSN